Paying attention to the ‘weave’

Our classically trained minds love distinctions. We seek the separate and individual rather than the interconnections. We identify the ‘thing’ before the fabric or the ‘weave’ – as Montuori a writer on complexity in education describes it – that gives it context.

Two distinctions I’ve become aware of recently through a research collaboration with the Gauteng City-Region Observatory are those of ‘environmental sustainability’ and ‘social justice’.   Both are enshrined in South Africa’s National Climate Change Response White Paper, amongst many other national policy documents.   As a society we purport to value and desire both. Yet we have given only very superficial thought as to how they might be related. We accept the current configuration of our social systems – our values, our behaviours, our economic and political interactions in particular – as given. From here we can see ‘win-wins’, instances where environmental sustainability and social justice appear to reinforce each other, such as the provision of Bus Rapid Transit systems in the country’s metros. We can also see instances where they appear to stand in direct opposition, such as the continuing of the South African coal fired power expansion programme in the name of social justice as employment creation and black economic empowerment.  This vantage point shows us a flat landscape, with few, tired, options.

But what happens if we pay a little more attention to the weave that connects them? What of the economic system that fetishises GDP growth? The education system that idolises a foreign and homogenous knowledge abstracted from any sense of place? The logic that assumes mass employment creation is best achieved by sending people underground to extract carbon that has been safely stored away there for millenia in order to burn it resulting in a mass release of greenhouse gases?  How are these things related? How else could they relate? What happens when we prod at these reified concepts of ‘environmental sustainability’ and ‘social justice’ to see what lies beneath their assumed benign benevolence? Whose environmental sustainability? Justice for whom? When? Where? And at what cost?

Perhaps its time to venture away from the perceived safety of our ‘neutral’ observation point. To enter the murkiness, to find and own our own place in it.


6 thoughts on “Paying attention to the ‘weave’

    1. Subversive maybe. Having been a conventional kind of a gal for many years I’m now coming round to subversion being necessary – we are just not making the inroads to these issues as fast as we need too within our current systems and worldviews. As for the ‘how’, there are examples and experiments out there, we need to connect them, support their replication in different contexts, pay attention to them, reflect on them and ourselves. This is a completely different kind of ‘doing’ to that which most of us are schooled in. With the theoretical obsessions of the phd (hopefully!) largely behind me, I’m hoping this blog can get more practical, more accessible, more interesting to those working on systemic change.


    1. Such a pleasure, Montuori is a wonderfully accessible writer. So the ‘weave’ comes from an article in ‘World Futures: The Journal of Global Education’. (2013) Vol 69,1, pp200-230, entitled ‘Complexity and transdisciplinarity: reflections on theory and practice’.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s